• Home RSS Feed

      by Published on 05-09-2012 07:37 AM

      Michael Tellinger made global history on the 24th April 2012, in Johannesburg when he filed his 1100-page NOTICE OF MOTION against Standard Bank in the Constitutional Court of South Africa, accusing the bank of unlawful and unconstitutional activity.

      Tellinger also served the legal papers on the RESERVE BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA and the MINISTER OF FINANCE, alleging that they are jointly and consciously implicated in the unscrupulous activity that has led to unimaginable financial hardship of the South African people.

      For too long have banking giants been unassailable and untouchable by the common man. Thousands have been repeatedly frustrated by the invisible protective legal shield around the banks, created by the legal system that seems to support their unlawful actions. Tellinger has changed this forever.

      The lack of control and intervention by the MINISTER OF FINANCE has allowed the banks and the RESERVE BANK to do as they please with impunity and in the process have enslaved millions of honest, hard-working South Africans to a life of misery and debt through the banks’ unconstitutional activities.

      The Constitutional Court is the highest court in the land that makes the laws and is mandated to develop common law principles. The legacy follows Nelson Mandela’s vision, that no matter who or what you represent, equality, justice and the people’s voice shall be harmonised before an independent, unbiased judicial system founded on the principles of rights enshrined in the Constitution.

      People have no idea what banks do behind the scenes, how many laws they break and how they profiteer off our signatures. This will all come out in this historic trial.

      While Tellinger awaits a court date, he appeals to everyone that has been harmed by their bank to join this important petition, so that it truly represents millions of honest and trusting citizens who have been unable to do so for themselves. The outcome of this case will change the laws that have allowed the banks to exploit humanity.

      Please sign the petition here: http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Sup...Africa/?launch

      Interview on CNBC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=UlHuJI5-PNc
      by Published on 05-07-2012 10:06 AM

      Was at the most random place this morning, a building material "half way house"... ones mans junk is another's ...
      by Published on 05-03-2012 10:18 PM

      Love is the answer to everything on this planet. If each one of us questioned each and every action we took with the question: "Am I doing this or that out of a desire for love" and answering the questions truthfully... we would most likely have a society ready to explore the far reaches of space...

      From the simplest things: "Is running through this red traffic light an action of love?" to the more complex "Is patenting a cure for cancer an action of love?".

      Doing anything that could potentially harm another is irresponsible. Running a traffic light, is irresponsible as much as consciously attempting to keep the key of knowledge to oneself in order to profit off others suffering. A concious world is one that shares freely, not one that patents and sues and feeds of the beast of power and money.

      You may not agree with my sentiment and those who love a monied world will not agree at all. The desire for money, wealth and control dictates that we guard our inventions and creativity in the loving shade of the money tree. On the other hand if the idea of money, wealth and control did not exist, then we would most likely bask in the light of sharing without being crippled by the desire of ego, control and power.

      What a wonderful world it could be.

      Recently I have been taking a step away from the "Freeman" type of thinking and philosophy... I believe there is a higher level of conciousness to be achieved and it is simply living life from a perspective of love. And to me, this means acknowledging that we are nothing in the absence of love.

      So I challenge you to live one day of your short life on this rock questioning every action you take with the question: "Am I doing what I am doing out of love?"

      I hope you have a love filled day.
      by Published on 03-08-2012 01:59 PM

      Press Release: Layperson Takes On The Might Of The Banks - representing himself.

      A true David versus Goliath case, will take place at the Johannesburg High Court at 9:30 am, on Tuesday, 13 March 2012, where the constitutional rights of all ordinary South Africans are being represented by a layperson who stood up against the might of the banks. This appeal hearing against a Judgement of execution of a property, will have far reaching and historic implications for millions of honest and hard-working people whose lives have been destroyed by the unscrupulous actions of banks in South Africa and the world. We urge all members of the media who have been concerned about the questionable activities of banks to attend this hearing to witness the first real attempt to level the playing field in favour of ordinary people. Among many attempts by ordinary people to take on the banks, Michael Tellinger has somehow managed to bring this matter to a real crescendo. The outcome of this hearing will have global implications and possibly even force a constitutional restructuring of financial policy.

      This is a very important court case. Please see invitation attached from the New Economic Rights Alliance. If you could come to the Johannesburg High Court to show your support, it could help us all. We really need you there! This press release and invitation has been compiled by the New Economics Rights Alliance.

      South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg on the 13 March 2012 at 09:30. Cnr. Pritchard and Von Brandis Streets (parking garage diagonally opposite).

      The arguments to be placed before the Honourable Court can be summarised as follows:-

      A) The loan agreement that stands between the borrower and lender is one of simulating to be sounding in money;

      B) That financial institutions, not being the institution that lends money, are selectively and prejudicing their true role; that is, acting as intermediary between parties;

      C) Further in relation to “B” above the contention will be presented that financial institutions are profiteering to the detriment, prejudice and fiduciary of the client;

      D) The cost incurred and interest derived from loans are subject to high interest rates, based on greed.

      E) In conclusion it will be held that financial institutions are their own cause to crises; their election to “manufacture” so called loans from book entries.


      In conclusion to the arguments above, the Honourable Court would be asked, inter alia to;-

      Inject a Commission of Enquiry into the operations of the banks that could include an audit finding;
      Legislative change in respect of the Constitution and various legislation to introduce full disclosure as the how the “money is obtained” and ratio of earning so to assist the individual to make informed decisions.
      Notwithstanding the above, a complaint will also be lodged with the Competition Tribunal.
      Review procedures in terms of assisting the general population afford housing of their choice.


      In light of global financial instability, your attendance would help demonstrate much needed public and media support.

      Yours faithfully,

      The New Economic Rights Alliance
      by Published on 02-18-2012 12:00 PM

      One of my favourite authors is Vick Beck, this is one of his latest emails:



      Now this is significant ...
      by Published on 02-16-2012 02:25 PM

      One of our members took this photograph...



      This is what it states:

      OUR MISSION (SARS)
      To optimize Revenue Yield, facilitate trade & enlist new Tax Contributors by promoting awareness of the obligation to voluntarily comply with South African Tax & Customes Laws, & to provide a quality & responsive service to the public...
      I am not sure how the words "voluntary" and "obligation" can fit in the same sentance, either it is an obligation or it is not... I guess it only becomes an obligation when a contract is put in place, this way you have volunteared for the obligation to pay tax...

      The bottom line, if you do not want to pay tax... don't sign the contract, ever!
      by Published on 02-13-2012 01:24 PM

      Dear Free people...

      We are slowly unraveling the rabbit hole thousands of us are working as one to bring light on the dark secrets that till now have been hidden.

      This is an offer for you to ask your bank for information (which is your right), if your banking institution is unable to provide the information that you request, we have a kick it where it hurts process that we are going to follow en-masse. We can not give you all the information now however if you wish to join the process then please take the time to request the following from your bank (you can find their email address here: http://micro2.majesticinteractive.co.za/bf.php?fid=1067)

      • Ask your bank to send you copies of any and all credit agreements that you have with them.
      • Take a look at your agreement/s. Is it absolutely clear that the bank actually has the money they are lending you? (Note: they cannot allude, or give an impression they have it.) Does it clearly state that they are the possessor of money?
      • You will almost certainly discover that the answer is no.
      Next, please send your complaint to the New Economic Rights Alliance (www.newera.org.za). Briefly explain that you feel that, based on the above, the agreement is not correct or is incomplete.

      The NewERA will assist you with next steps.

      Regards,

      The JJC

      PS. Question: "But I got the money, so who cares what the credit agreement says?"
      Answer: Do not be fooled, this process (and many like it) are the tools of choice that are being used to steel the worlds resources from the people.